Empirical Evidence on the Construct Validity and Reliability of an Instrument Assessing Antecedents to Willingness to Pay a Premium: A Pilot Study

Authors

  • Normaziah Che Musa Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7271-2221
  • Baharudin Kadir Faculty of Business, UNITAR International University, Malaysia

Keywords:

environmental concern, perceived credibility, perceived relative advantage, sustainable labelling, willingness to pay a premium

Abstract

Research on sustainable and green consumption behaviour has been widely studied, including within the Malaysian context. However, there has been limited research on sustainable labelling on packaged food among Malaysian consumers. Therefore, there is a limited questionnaire specifically tailored to this sustainable labelling on packaged food products. A pilot test was carried out to support an investigation into the antecedents of consumers’ WTPP for sustainably labelled packaged food. Based on Signaling Theory and Diffusion of Innovation Theory, a conceptual framework comprising six constructs was formulated. In total, 34 questionnaire items were adopted or adapted from prior studies. Responses from 30 working adults were evaluated to assess the measurement instrument. All six constructs used to examine the antecedents of WTPP, Altruistic Concerns (AC), Biospheric Concerns (BC), Egoistic Concerns (EC), Perceived Credibility (PC), Perceived Relative Advantage (PRA), and WTPP, demonstrated strong internal consistency. At this pilot study stage, internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Their alpha values are 0.899, 0.913, 0.904, 0.901, 0.860, and 0.890, respectively, exceeding the recommended minimum threshold of 0.70. In addition, the corrected item-total correlations for all items were above 0.30, confirming that each item contributes meaningfully to its respective construct and is psychometrically sound. These pilot results indicate the questionnaire items are suitable for use in future research and may offer useful evidence to inform sustainable labelling policies, certification standards, and incentives that promote greener manufacturing among Malaysian producers.

References

Al Mamun, A., Naznen, F., Yang, Q., Ali, M. H., & Hashim, N. M. H. N. (2023). Modelling the significance of celebrity endorsement and consumer interest on attitude, purchase intention, and willingness to pay a premium price for green skincare products. Heliyon, 9(6), e16765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16765

Al Mamun, A., Syed Ali Fazal, Ahmad, G., Yaacob, M. R., & Mohamad, Mohd. R. (2018). Willingness to Pay for Environmentally Friendly Products among Low-Income Households along Coastal Peninsular Malaysia. Sustainability, 10(5), 1316. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051316

Alam, S. S., Wang, C.-K., Masukujjaman, M., Ahmad, I., Lin, C.-Y., & Ho, Y.-H. (2023). Buying Behaviour towards Eco-Labelled Food Products: Mediation Moderation Analysis. Sustainability, 15(3), 2474. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032474

Bastounis, A., Buckell, J., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Cook, B., King, S., Potter, C., Bianchi, F., Rayner, M., & Jebb, S. A. (2021). The Impact of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Willingness-to-Pay for Foods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments. Nutrients, 13(8), 2677. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13082677

Bhutto, M. H., Shaikh, A. A., & Sharma, R. (2021). Factors Affecting the Consumers’ Purchase Intention and Willingness-to-Pay More for Electric-Vehicle Technology. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Electronic Business., 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356665297_Factors_Affecting_the_Consumers'_Purchase_Intention_and_Willingness-to-Pay_More_for_Electric-Vehicle_Technology_Full_Paper

Bujang, M. A., Omar, E. D., Foo, D. H. P., & Hon, Y. K. (2024). Sample size determination for conducting a pilot study to assess reliability of a questionnaire. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 49(1), e3. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2024.49.e3

Bushara, M. A., Abdou, A. H., Hassan, T. H., Sobaih, A. E. E., Albohnayh, A. S. M., Alshammari, W. G., Aldoreeb, M., Elsaed, A. A., & Elsaied, M. A. (2023). Power of Social Media Marketing: How Perceived Value Mediates the Impact on Restaurant Followers’ Purchase Intention, Willingness to Pay a Premium Price, and E-WoM? Sustainability, 15(6), 5331. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065331

Cheah, J.-H., Memon, M. A., Chuah, F., Ting, H., & Ramayah, T. (2018). ASSESSING REFLECTIVE MODELS IN MARKETING RESEARCH: A COMPARISON BETWEEN PLS AND PLSc ESTIMATES. International Journal of Business and Society, 19(1), 139–160.

Cruz, S. M., & Manata, B. (2020). Measurement of Environmental Concern: A Review and Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00363

Fanasch, P., & Frick, B. (2020). The value of signals: Do self-declaration and certification generate price premiums for organic and biodynamic wines? 249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119415

Filho, W. L., Trevisan, L. V., Dinis, M. A. P., Ulmer, N., Paço, A., Borsari, B., Sierra, J., & Salvia, A. (2024). Fostering students’ participation in the implementation of the sustainable development goals at higher education institutions. Discover Sustainability, 5(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00204-7

Hair, J. F., L.D.S. Gabriel, M., Da Silva, D., & Braga Junior, S. (2019). Development and validation of attitudes measurement scales: Fundamental and practical aspects. RAUSP Management Journal, 54(4), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2019-0098

Hamilton, R. W., Mittal, C., Shah, A., Thompson, D. V., & Griskevicius, V. (2019). How Financial Constraints Influence Consumer Behavior: An Integrative Framework. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 29(2), 285–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1074

Hosseinikhah Choshaly, S. (2019). Applying innovation attributes to predict purchase intention for the eco-labeled products: A Malaysian case study. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(4), 583–599. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-04-2019-0038

Khanal, B., & Chhetri, D. B. (2024). A Pilot Study Approach to Assessing the Reliability and Validity of Relevancy and Efficacy Survey Scale. Janabhawana Research Journal, 3(1), 35–49. https://doi.org/10.3126/jrj.v3i1.68384

Leggen, L. N. (2023). Green Brand Image in Digital Retail—A research on Green Labeling Impact on Willingness to Pay [Catolica Portugese]. https://repositorio.ucp.pt/bitstream/10400.14/41335/1/203278143.pdf

Lestari, M. R., & Nita, A. (2021). The Influence of Sustainable Product’s Attributes Toward the Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Product. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(8), 542–551. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i8.981

Ma, X., Liu, Z., Meng, T., Florkowski, W. J., & Mu, Y. (2022). Impact of Food Sustainability Labels on the Price of Rice in Online Sales. Foods, 11(23), 3781. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11233781

Masuwai, A., Zulkifli, H., & Hamzah, M. I. (2024). Evaluation of content validity and face validity of secondary school Islamic education teacher self-assessment instrument. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2308410. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2308410

Minh Vu, Q., Kai Liao, Y., Thi, Y., Nu To Truong, G., Minh Binh Nguyen, P., & Wu, W.-Y. (2022). The Influence of Personality Traits on Intention to Purchase Green Products. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSSMET.298675

Moussa, S., & Touzani, M. (2008). The perceived credibility of quality labels: A scale validation with refinement. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 526–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2008.00713.x

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (Issue 972). McGraw-Hill Companies,Incorporated. https://books.google.com.my/books?id=r0fuAAAAMAAJ

Oesman, I. (2021). Consumers’ Willingness to Pay More for Eco Friendly Products (Green Products) Classification Daily Needs Products. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics Engineering and Social Science, InCEESS 2020, 17-18 July, Bekasi, Indonesia. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Economics Engineering and Social Science, InCEESS 2020, 17-18 July, Bekasi, Indonesia, Bekasi, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.17-7-2020.2303067

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Qi, L. W., Narayana Nair, M. N., & Munusamy, K. (2024). Driving Factors of Working Adults Organic Food Purchase Intentions. International Journal of Business and Technology Management, 6(2), 467–478. https://doi.org/10.55057/ijbtm.2024.6.2.41

Ramu, P., Osman, M., Abdul Mutalib, N. A., Aljaberi, M. A., Lee, K.-H., Lin, C.-Y., & Hamat, R. A. (2023). Validity and Reliability of a Questionnaire on the Knowledge, Attitudes, Perceptions and Practices toward Food Poisoning among Malaysian Secondary School Students: A Pilot Study. Healthcare, 11(6), 853. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060853

Schultz, P. W. (2001). THE STRUCTURE OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCERN FOR SELF, OTHER PEOPLE, AND THE BIOSPHERE. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach (5th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Shahidi Hamedani, S., Aslam, S., & Shahidi Hamedani, S. (2025). AI in business operations: Driving urban growth and societal sustainability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1568210. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1568210

Singh, P., Sahadev, S., Wei, X., & Henninger, C. E. (2023). Modelling the antecedents of consumers’ willingness to pay for eco‐labelled food products. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1256–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12900

Stachewicz, A. B. (2011). Measuring the perceived attributes of innovation: A study of capacitive switch technology in industrially designed user interface controls [Eastern Michigan University]. https://commons.emich.edu/theses/359/

Ut-tha, V., Lee, P.-P., & Chung, R. (2021). Willingness to Pay for Sustainable Coffee: A Case of Thai Consumers. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211052956. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211052956

Vicente, P., Marques, C., & Reis, E. (2021). Willingness to Pay for Environmental Quality: The Effects of Pro-Environmental Behavior, Perceived Behavior Control, Environmental Activism, and Educational Level. Sage Open, 11(4), 21582440211025256. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211025256

Wei, S., Ang, T., & Jancenelle, V. E. (2018). Willingness to pay more for green products: The interplay of consumer characteristics and customer participation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 45, 230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2018.08.015

Zhang, H., & Yin, D. (2025). The Role of Green Marketing Strategies in Promoting Sustainable Development. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 10(1), 20250203. https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2025-0203

Downloads

Published

2026-02-25

Issue

Section

Full Paper